Obama The Practical

July 23, 2008 – 10:50 am

A guest perspective……..

BY JOHN WINKLER

It’s fun to watch Obamaniacs’ disillusion over Their Chosen One’s changes of position. They seem to view his modifications as a form of treason but it’s really been quite clear that what the man is is a very good politician. He seems to have always understood that the way to power was the path of the empty vessel—allowing himself to be filled by his fans with whatever they needed to see in a national leader. And so he was painted as a change agent, a new kind of politician. And much of this has come from a national perspective. But in Illinois the view has been just a little bit different.

The salient point to understand about Illinois is that it is one of the most politically corrupt states in the nation. We have one scandal after another, one trial after another, and we probably hold the record for the number of governors sent to the big house. Our current leader just may be on the first leg of that journey.

None of which is to say that Obama is corrupt. But he didn’t get where he got by failing to understand how the system works. And there is no question he has been part of that system.

The country is now familiar with the name Tony Rezko, the convicted political fraudster who’s now in jail for his unsavory gaming of the system. Rezko was the very first contributor to Obama when he was just starting his career. He was a man who was known as a purchaser of politicians, so it was more than a little odd that Obama allowed Rezko to essentially give him a several-hundred-thousand-dollar discount on his house by buying his backyard for him. When caught Obama says he made a mistake.

By comparison some of his political endorsements are hardly worth mentioning, but they say a lot about his method of operation…….

Exhibit A– Todd Stroger. He is the incompetent and widely reviled president of the Cook County Board who inherited the job after his father suffered a stroke. There are said to be something like 14 Strogers on the county payroll, which says a great deal about how things work here. There were competent reformers running for the job but Todd Stroger was endorsed by Obama, hardly the choice of a New Kind of Politician.

Then there’s the slightly strange case of Alexi Giannoulias. He was a complete unknown until an Obama endorsement vaulted him into Somebodyhood. Young Alexi was 29 when he ran for the State Treasurer. He promoted himself as an experienced banker who could whip the state’s finances into shape. He failed to mention that he got the bank job because his daddy owned the place and made him an officer. During the campaign it came out that the bank had some dealings with convicted felons who had mob ties. Young Alexi tried hard to disassociate himself from these people but his stories didn’t hold much water. Still, Obama gave his strong endorsement, and did a crucial campaign commercial for Giannoulias. He did it, not because Alexi was the best candidate, but because the bank had been a strong financial supporter of Obama candidacies.

Depending on your point of view, this background could be seen as oddly reassuring. Whatever else he is, it’s clear that Obama is a practical politician whose career has been grounded in political reality. Politics is a game that Barack knows how to play. If he wins he will certainly owe many large debts to various Democratic constituencies, but conservatives may be able to console themselves with the thought that it could have been a lot worse. Obama’s demonstrated practical streak may indicate that he will manage the government from the center, not the Left.

John Winkler, a former producer at ABC Network News, is now a newsman at ABC’s local affiliate in Chicago.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Could His Oil Policy Cost Obama the Election?
Thoughts From Charlie Munger
Read more on Obama's Presidential Policy at Wikinvest
  1. 6 Responses to “Obama The Practical”

  2. I agree with your closing quote. Obama seems much too smart to actually govern as far left as he sometimes sounds. Here’s hoping for a centrist (and a Republican Congress to balance him out, although that seems highly unlikely).

    There was a good article in a recent New Yorker on Obama’s rise through the rough and tumble world of Chicago/Illinois politics. I found it very helpful in understanding a part of his development that (suprisingly) hadn’t yet gotten much precise media scrutiny.

    By Tony R. on Jul 23, 2008

  3. Obama has risen on his own and to such heights. He’s held steady which is amazing. I think he’s a great candidate. I hope he wins. please vote for Obama! Visit WhyObama08.org!

    By Aiken Blue on Jul 23, 2008

  4. John,

    So what, what’s your point. Is your public service announcement intended to make Obama supporters or fence sitters just be more aware of our candidate so that we can second guess what we have seen and like from Obama? Should we just take a pass on Obama and vote for Mccain because of your revolutionary news flash that comes in the final hour when the only choice left is Mccain? Since Obama is not squeky clean we should maybe consider Mccain because he’s never acted like politicaian and his high moral servitude (now supports torture, wants to go to war with Iran,and contiue an illegal occupation). Again, what is your point? Mccain has spent 26 years telling us what he is all about and the last 7+ years voting with Bush 95% of the time. What is your point? I’ll be on standby for your next article where you tell us how corrupt Mccain is.

    PS: Could you also forward me the number of Americans who lost their lives due to Obama’s policys and voting choices?

    By Leslie on Aug 10, 2008

  5. Leslie–
    Wow, that’s one large load of anger and bitterness.

    Since you apparently didn’t notice, I never mentioned McCain, nor did i suggest or imply that McCain is politically purer, or a better candidate than Obama.

    My point was pretty simple– that contrary to what some of his acolytes seem to think, Obama is very much a practical politician who has done some things in his career that do not qualify him for sainthood.

    And I suggested his history indicates Obama might govern from a postition closer to the political center than some of his true believers would like. Since I’m not much for ideologues of any stripe, I think this is a good thing, though apparently you don’t.

    By John Winkler on Aug 12, 2008

  1. 2 Trackback(s)

  2. Jan 23, 2009: HomeLoanAgents Blog - Caroline Kennedy….OUT!
  3. Mar 2, 2009: Financial Meltdown » Lunchtime Links 3-2

Post a Comment